Pubblicazioni

Autori:

Velo Dalbrenta, Daniele

Titolo:

An Inevitable Verdict (or Perhaps Not). The Rhetoric of ‘Reasonable Doubt’ in Twelve Angry Men by Sidney Lumet

Anno:

2026

Tipologia prodotto:

Articolo in Rivista

Tipologia ANVUR:

Articolo su rivista

Lingua:

Inglese

Formato:

Elettronico

Referee:

Sì

Nome rivista:

TOPOI

ISSN Rivista:

1572-8749

N° Volume:

Theorizing Rhetoric: Bridging Concepts Across Multiple Perspectives, Different Practices and Contexts

Intervallo pagine:

1-10

Parole chiave:

Jury, Reasonable doubt, Conflict, Truth, Justice

Breve descrizione dei contenuti:

Twelve jurors find themselves ‘trapped’ in the deliberation room, struggling to reach a unanimous verdict on a case that should have been ‘easy’, until the stubborn insistence of one of them begins to reveal its full complexity by means of the rhetoric of ‘reasonable doubt’. With Twelve Angry Men, Sidney Lumet stages a courtroom drama that has set a benchmark in the genre (if only for making the workings of a jury visible) and that might appear to lend itself to an easy reading. Unless, just as in the film, one attempts to dig deeper.

Pagina Web:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-025-10360-8

Id prodotto:

150584

Handle IRIS:

11562/1187787

ultima modifica:

2 aprile 2026

Citazione bibliografica:

Velo Dalbrenta, Daniele, An Inevitable Verdict (or Perhaps Not). The Rhetoric of ‘Reasonable Doubt’ in Twelve Angry Men by Sidney Lumet «TOPOI» , vol. Theorizing Rhetoric: Bridging Concepts Across Multiple Perspectives, Different Practices and Contexts , 2026 , pp. 1-10

Consulta la scheda completa presente nel repository istituzionale della Ricerca di Ateneo